wxWidgets/tests/benchmarks/regex.cpp
Vadim Zeitlin 020b5f7383 Add simple wxRegEx benchmark
Allow testing speed of some simple regex operations to compare the speed
of the currently used regex library with some other alternatives.
2021-07-15 21:44:28 +02:00

75 lines
1.9 KiB
C++

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// Name: tests/benchmarks/regex.cpp
// Purpose: wxRegEx benchmarks
// Author: Vadim Zeitlin
// Created: 2018-11-15
// Copyright: (c) 2018 Vadim Zeitlin <vadim@wxwidgets.org>
// Licence: wxWindows licence
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
#include "wx/ffile.h"
#include "wx/regex.h"
#include "bench.h"
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Benchmark relative costs of compiling and matching for a simple regex
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
static const char* const RE_SIMPLE = ".";
BENCHMARK_FUNC(RECompile)
{
return wxRegEx(RE_SIMPLE).IsValid();
}
BENCHMARK_FUNC(REMatch)
{
static wxRegEx re(RE_SIMPLE);
return re.Matches("foo");
}
BENCHMARK_FUNC(RECompileAndMatch)
{
return wxRegEx(RE_SIMPLE).Matches("foo");
}
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Benchmark the cost of using a more complicated regex
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
namespace
{
// Use the contents of an already existing test file.
const wxString& GetTestText()
{
static wxString text;
if ( text.empty() )
{
wxFFile("htmltest.html").ReadAll(&text);
}
return text;
}
} // anonymous namespace
BENCHMARK_FUNC(REFindTD)
{
// This is too simplistic, but good enough for benchmarking.
static wxRegEx re("<td>[^<]*</td>", wxRE_ICASE | wxRE_NEWLINE);
int matches = 0;
for ( const wxChar* p = GetTestText().c_str(); re.Matches(p); ++matches )
{
size_t start, len;
if ( !re.GetMatch(&start, &len) )
return false;
p += start + len;
}
return matches == 21; // result of "grep -c"
}