153 lines
7.6 KiB
Markdown
153 lines
7.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
title: >-
|
||
Sox Accounting
|
||
...
|
||
Accounting and bookkeeping is failing in an increasingly low trust world
|
||
of ever less trusting and ever less trustworthy elites, and Sarbanes-Oxley
|
||
accounting (Sox) is an evil product of this evil failure.
|
||
|
||
Enron was a ponzi scam that pretended to be in the business of buying and
|
||
selling. They would sell stuff cheap for cash on the barrelhead, then buy it
|
||
dear on credit, and have the seller deliver the stuff to the buyer, without
|
||
themselves ever going near the stuff, or knowing anything about the stuff.
|
||
|
||
And, as ponzi scams tend to do, need to do, they grew and grew and grew,
|
||
resulting many excited investors buying Enron shares.
|
||
|
||
And some people wondered, “where are these mighty profits coming from? How
|
||
can you create value without ever getting anywhere near anything that actually
|
||
has value?”. To which Enron replied “financial wizardry”, which was, in a
|
||
sense, true.
|
||
|
||
But Enron kept books.
|
||
|
||
Enron hired the very best and most respectable accountants to go over its
|
||
books with the greatest of thoroughness, and paid them very well indeed
|
||
to do so.
|
||
|
||
The very respectable accountants turned somersaults to avoid seeing evil.
|
||
|
||
Some suspicious investors hired a bunch of accounting students, who were
|
||
not employed by a respectable accounting firm, nor subject to any
|
||
respectable authority of respectable accountants properly established in the
|
||
respectable accounting profession, to go over Enron’s books with a fine
|
||
tooth comb.
|
||
|
||
It quickly became obvious to these disreputable accounting students that
|
||
Enron was a ponzi scheme, that the books were the books of ponzi
|
||
scheme, that the books were true though misleading, and truly reported a
|
||
ponzi scheme losing money hand over fist.
|
||
|
||
The investors made the results of this examination of Enron’s books
|
||
public.
|
||
|
||
When the whole thing blew up, a great many discussions came to light
|
||
which amounted to Enron asking the very respectable accountants how to
|
||
help the very respectable accountants refrain from seeing what they were
|
||
seeing, the very respectable accountants asking each other and other very
|
||
respectable accountants how to not see what they were seeing, and the
|
||
very respectable accountants then telling Enron how protect the very
|
||
respectable accountants from seeing what they were seeing.
|
||
|
||
And suddenly people stopped being willing to pay Enron cash on the
|
||
barrelhead for goods, suddenly stopped being willing to sell Enron goods
|
||
on credit. Suddenly Enron could no longer pay its employees, nor its
|
||
landlord. Its employees stopped turning up, its landlord chucked their
|
||
furniture out into the street.
|
||
|
||
Problem solved.
|
||
|
||
If only it had stayed solved, but much bigger trouble was in store.
|
||
|
||
Suddenly people started not respecting very respectable accountants.
|
||
Suddenly people started not trusting books kept by very respectable
|
||
accountants for very respectable businesses.
|
||
|
||
The accountants rushed to the government, and said “Accounting is
|
||
collapsing. Business is in chaos. You must *force* people to respect us. (And
|
||
also regulate the hell out of us to ~~make our crimes legal~~ ensure that none
|
||
of us commit these crimes again)”
|
||
|
||
Investors who had purchased Enron’s shares, and sellers who had sold Enron
|
||
stuff on credit, rushed to the government and said “Accountants are
|
||
untrustworthy, businesses are untrustworthy. We have a crisis of trust. You
|
||
must regulate the hell out of them to *force* them to be trustworthy.”
|
||
|
||
Of course you cannot force people to be trustworthy. You can, however force
|
||
people to act as if they trusted people that they do not in fact trust.
|
||
Which prevents people from freely associating with trustworthy people
|
||
and from refusing to associate with untrustworthy people, the crisis being
|
||
in large part that people were disinclined to associate with very respectable
|
||
accountants, and were instead inclined to associate with the thoroughly
|
||
disreputable accounting students and the investors who had hired them.
|
||
|
||
So there was in practice a great deal of overlap between very respectable
|
||
accountants asking government to force business to use their services and
|
||
naïve idiots asking government to force business and accountants to
|
||
behave in a more trustworthy manner.
|
||
|
||
And so, we got a huge bundle of accounting regulation, Sarbanes-Oxley.
|
||
|
||
Sox required publicly traded companies to keep their books in accordance
|
||
with certain rules, and has in fact successfully prevented any publicly
|
||
traded companies from doing an Enron in the exact same way that Enron
|
||
did it, though what MF Global did was not hugely different.
|
||
|
||
But it directly contributed the Great Minority Mortgage Meltdown. The
|
||
purpose of book keeping is to track the movement and creation of value.
|
||
Accounting is the art and science of making sense out of the books, and
|
||
making sure the books make sense. In the aftermath of the Great Minority
|
||
Mortgage Meltdown, a whole lot of entities went belly up, and when the
|
||
creditors went through the books, they found all the mortgages the entities
|
||
supposedly owned, but were frequently unable to find the physical people
|
||
supposedly responsible for paying these mortgages,
|
||
and were sometimes unable to find the physical properties that
|
||
were supposedly security for these mortgages.
|
||
|
||
Sox books just tend to not track value very well, because they
|
||
just don't track physical reality, being designed for a
|
||
different, more complex, and difficult to define, task. Sox books tend to
|
||
track official reality and disregard the reality of the ground beneath your
|
||
feet, the things in your hands, and what is before your eyes, with the result
|
||
that they tend to track the creation of holiness and ritual purity, rather than
|
||
the creation of value.
|
||
|
||
From the seventeenth century to the nineteenth, bookkeeping was explicitly Christian.
|
||
The immutable append only journal reflected God's creation, the balance of the books
|
||
was an earthly reflection of the divine scales of justice and the symmetry of God’s creation.
|
||
When the dust settled over the Great Minority Mortgage Meltdown it became apparent that
|
||
the books of the financial entities involved had little connection to God's creation.
|
||
|
||
But the biggest problem with Sarbanes-Oxley is not that it has failed to
|
||
force publicly traded companies and their accountants to act in
|
||
a trustworthy manner, but that it has forced them to act in an untrustworthy
|
||
manner.
|
||
|
||
It is not only very difficult and enormously expensive to comply with Sox.
|
||
It is also *impossible* to comply with Sox. What publicly traded companies
|
||
do instead is hire an accounting firm so well connected to the regulators
|
||
that when it blesses the books it has prepared as Sox compliant, the
|
||
regulators will pretend to believe. Which is great for the very respectable
|
||
accountants, who get paid a great deal of money, and great for the
|
||
regulators, who get paid off, but is terrible for businesses who pay a great
|
||
deal of money and do not in fact get books that accurately tell
|
||
management how the business is doing, and considerably worse for
|
||
startups trying to go public, since the potential investors know that the
|
||
books do not accurately tell the investors how the business is doing.
|
||
|
||
What established businesses do instead is prepare one set of books for
|
||
Sox compliance, and another illegal and forbidden
|
||
set of books for management that do not comply
|
||
with Sox but which actually do reflect the movement and creation of
|
||
value, but a startup is not allowed to tell potential investors about the
|
||
real books that actually reflect the movement and creation of value for the
|
||
purpose of an IPO.
|
||
|
||
Which has killed off startups and IPOs, which used to be my bread and
|
||
butter.
|
||
|
||
To do a startup again, we are going to have to do it on a blockdag.
|
||
|
||
(Blockdags being the latest advance in blockchains, an unbalanced Merkle
|
||
dag instead of an unblanced Merkle tree.)
|