175 lines
7.5 KiB
HTML
175 lines
7.5 KiB
HTML
<!DOCTYPE html>
|
||
<html lang="en"><head>
|
||
|
||
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
|
||
<style>
|
||
p.center {
|
||
text-align:center;
|
||
}
|
||
</style><title>The Cypherpunk Program</title></head><body>
|
||
|
||
<p><a href="./"> To Home page</a> </p>
|
||
|
||
<h1>The Cypherpunk Program</h1><p>
|
||
|
||
Timothy C. May summarized the plan as</p>
|
||
<blockquote><p>
|
||
|
||
“Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, anonymous
|
||
networks, digital pseudonyms, zero knowledge,
|
||
reputations, information markets, black markets,
|
||
collapse of government. </p></blockquote><p>
|
||
|
||
Which is intentionally obscure. The plan is to strike
|
||
at the state from the jungle of complexity, to strike at
|
||
the state from beyond the state’s intellectual and
|
||
temporal horizons. The evil minions of the state will
|
||
not be coming after cypherpunks, because they will not
|
||
understand what cypherpunks are doing, and because when
|
||
things start going bad for them the will not be able to
|
||
link cause and effect. </p><p>
|
||
|
||
Cryptography alone is insufficient to implement
|
||
crypto-anarchy. Correct understanding and
|
||
implementation of cryptography has proven to be hard, as
|
||
numerous embarrassing failures have demonstrated, but
|
||
correct understanding and implementation of cryptography
|
||
turned out to be only the beginning of what was
|
||
needed. </p><p>
|
||
|
||
Often secure cryptographic algorithms have been used to
|
||
construct insecure cryptographic protocols, as for
|
||
example the wifi protocol WPA personal, but worse than
|
||
that, correct cryptographic protocols, such as SSL, have
|
||
resulted in insecure behavior, because the protocol flow
|
||
failed to fit the user’s task flow. </p><p>
|
||
|
||
Successfully designing such systems requires a whole
|
||
system viewpoint – cryptographic protocols <em>and</em>
|
||
user interface <em>and</em> business models <em>and</em>
|
||
accounting principles <em>and</em> economic understanding
|
||
<em>and</em> understanding of computer mediated social
|
||
networking. </p><p>
|
||
|
||
The cypherpunk movement collapsed in the realization that
|
||
the problem was harder than it seemed, that mere
|
||
cryptography was insufficient. </p><p>
|
||
|
||
The cypherpunk movement produced a lot of cryptographic
|
||
tools, among them by own Crypto Kong, only to realize
|
||
that no one wanted <em>cryptographic</em> tools. To
|
||
use a <em>cryptographic</em> tool, you have to
|
||
understand and think about what it is doing, understand
|
||
and think about the cryptographic primitives involved
|
||
every time you use it. Unfortunately, even committees
|
||
of experts tend to screw up when they attempt to
|
||
specify correct use of cryptographic primitives. For
|
||
example the Wifi consortium got it badly wrong, then
|
||
having discovered their error as large numbers of
|
||
people started freeloading on other people’s wifi,
|
||
proceeded to get it wrong again. Then they yet
|
||
another try, and proceeded to get it wrong all over
|
||
again. The latest incarnation of Wifi, as I write this,
|
||
is WPA personal which is vulnerable to offline
|
||
dictionary attack, an attack that has been well known,
|
||
well understood, and the solutions to it well known for
|
||
a very long time. Similarly for DNSSEC, and IPSEC,
|
||
where time after time they got the cryptography correct,
|
||
unlike Wifi, but managed every time to produce non
|
||
solutions that no one could use or would use. </p><p>
|
||
|
||
No way can end users be expected to burden themselves
|
||
with such a task, when the experts fail over and over.
|
||
Rather, cryptography needs to be embedded invisibly in
|
||
tools that do user tasks, and make those tasks secure
|
||
without the end user ever thinking about cryptography.
|
||
SSH is the best example of a tool that works like this.
|
||
You never see a dialog box that relates to cryptographic
|
||
matters. It is just secure. It acts the way people
|
||
expect it to act, and they don’t need to think about
|
||
the messy details of how it ensures that hostile
|
||
adversaries cannot meddle and make things fail in
|
||
unexpected ways. Similarly, Skype’s encryption is
|
||
invisibly embodied in a utility that people use to
|
||
communicate with each other, and no one should ever be
|
||
aware of it. </p><p>
|
||
|
||
If people use secure tools to mediate cooperation, and
|
||
the storage and creation of value, to do business, then
|
||
those tools will not only be secure against ordinary
|
||
criminals, but against governments – whereupon it becomes
|
||
hard for governments to collect taxes or regulate business,
|
||
hard for governments to intrude themselves in honest
|
||
peaceful activities. </p><p>
|
||
|
||
As soon as we produced the first not very satisfactory
|
||
versions of such tools, and early adopters came to use
|
||
them, we hit the second problem. The cypherpunk
|
||
program requires heavy reliance on value, exchange, and
|
||
promises to pay and deliver being computer mediated.
|
||
But computers are extremely insecure. One’s
|
||
computer is apt to come under the control of hostile
|
||
criminals. The computer virus and Trojan problem
|
||
makes it impractical to keep large amounts of value on
|
||
a computer. Similarly, the phishing problem makes it
|
||
difficult to have internet mediate relationships of
|
||
economic value. The anonymity that gives protection
|
||
against governments makes it alarmingly easy for people
|
||
to pretend to be what they are not. And then
|
||
we discovered that net centric anonymous or weakly
|
||
nymous money was violently unpopular because of
|
||
criminals flocking to it, provoking governments to shut
|
||
it down. </p><p>
|
||
|
||
And so, the cypherpunk movement collapsed. The remaining cypherpunks patiently
|
||
studied solutions to these problems, and, by and large,
|
||
solutions have been discovered, though these solutions
|
||
are not yet implemented, or the implementations are
|
||
not yet widely adopted, perhaps not yet ready for
|
||
wide adoption. </p><p>
|
||
|
||
The problems that shut down the cypherpunk movement are
|
||
|
||
</p><ol><li>Cryptography is hard, cryptographic protocols
|
||
that actually work are harder, and embedding those
|
||
protocols invisibly in utilities that do useful things
|
||
without the end user needing to know or think about
|
||
cryptography considerably harder still: To solve this we
|
||
need <a href="replacing_TCP.html">higher level tools
|
||
which automatically apply known sound protocols to the
|
||
particular case</a>, so that good cryptography can be a
|
||
routine and invisible part of good applications, without
|
||
requiring as much thought as it now does.</li>
|
||
|
||
<li>Computer insecurity, Trojans and malware: To
|
||
solve this, we need to restrict programs using the
|
||
<a href="./safe_operating_system.html">powerbox software
|
||
pattern</a></li>
|
||
|
||
<li>Phishing</li>
|
||
|
||
<li>Violently unpopular criminal misuse of net centered
|
||
money</li> </ol><p>
|
||
|
||
Few people use encryption technology today, because few
|
||
people have real need of it. </p><p>
|
||
|
||
Few people have real need of it, because there is no
|
||
reasonably liquid net money. People are not making, spending,
|
||
transferring, and promising, money through the net, so they
|
||
have little need to encrypt their messages or care for the
|
||
reputation of their nyms. </p><p>
|
||
|
||
And that is the big remaining battle and design issue: <a
|
||
href="net_money.html">net money</a> though even if we
|
||
designed and deployed a satisfactory net money, it would not
|
||
come to be widely used for large value transactions until
|
||
a <a href="safe_operating_sytem.html">secure operating
|
||
system</a> is created and deployed, it can still be created
|
||
and deployed for low value transactions such as file
|
||
sharing and spam control – one message client would charge
|
||
a very small amount to accept messages from people not one one’s white
|
||
list. The fee would be refunded if one does not classify
|
||
the message as spam.</p>
|
||
|
||
</body></html> |