Explaining wipe of private secrets so that no smartass will "improve" it
This commit is contained in:
parent
76b1948972
commit
d81b7043df
@ -334,7 +334,11 @@ namespace ristretto255 {
|
||||
std::array<uint8_t, crypto_core_ristretto255_SCALARBYTES> blob;
|
||||
static_assert(sizeof(blob) == 32, "watch for size and alignment bugs. Everyone should standarize on 256 bit secret keys except for special needs");
|
||||
explicit scalar() = default;
|
||||
~scalar() noexcept { wxSecretValue::Wipe(sizeof(*this), this); }
|
||||
~scalar() noexcept { wxSecretValue::Wipe(sizeof(*this), this); } /*calls wipe to avoid leaving secrets around in memory.
|
||||
Because wxSecretValue::Wipe is in a different optimisation unit, a separately compiled library,
|
||||
optimisation of the destructor cannot optimise away the call to the wipe,
|
||||
because the destructor optimiser does not know that all wipe does is
|
||||
write to memory that is about to be discarded, nor can the wipe optimiser know that. */
|
||||
explicit constexpr scalar(std::array<uint8_t, crypto_core_ristretto255_BYTES>&& in) : blob{ in } {};
|
||||
explicit constexpr scalar(std::array<uint8_t, crypto_core_ristretto255_BYTES>* in) :blob(*in) {};
|
||||
explicit constexpr scalar(uintmax_t k){ for (auto& j : blob) { j = k; k = k >> 8; } }
|
||||
@ -345,9 +349,9 @@ namespace ristretto255 {
|
||||
static_assert (ro::is_standard_signed_integer<T>);
|
||||
if (i < 0) crypto_core_ristretto255_scalar_negate(&blob[0], &blob[0]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
scalar(scalar&&) = default; // Move constructor
|
||||
scalar(scalar&&) = default; // Move constructor. Does not need to call wipe, because destructor will be called on source
|
||||
scalar(const scalar&) = default; // Copy constructor
|
||||
scalar& operator=(scalar&&) = default; // Move assignment.
|
||||
scalar& operator=(scalar&&) = default; // Move assignment. Does not need to call wipe, because destructor will be called on source
|
||||
scalar& operator=(const scalar&) = default; // Copy assignment.
|
||||
/* Don't need constant time equality test
|
||||
bool operator==(const scalar& sc) const& {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user