2023-08-25 17:45:47 -04:00
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
title:
|
|
|
|
Vision Statement
|
|
|
|
sidebar: false
|
|
|
|
notmine: false
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not only money secured by the blockchain, but pseudonymous identities with money and
|
|
|
|
reputation secured by the blockchain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satoshi was after the money in the seignorage tax. There is also a lot of money in
|
|
|
|
eBay and Amazon owning other people's reputations, a lot of money in the domain name
|
|
|
|
system, and a lot of money in limited liability company name registration. eBay is
|
|
|
|
entirely a search engine for the reputation data of people doing transactions and
|
|
|
|
Amazon is largely such a search engine, and the primary asset value of most businesses is the goodwill accrued by their registered company name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our vision is a web 3.0 whose root of identity is not domain certificate authorities
|
|
|
|
and registrars, but the master secrets of wallets. The seizure or blocking of domain
|
|
|
|
names by authorities has become a big problem, as is Amazon and eBay casually
|
|
|
|
mistreating and exploiting the people who rely on their reputation systems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satoshi's objective with Bitcoin was to allow people to transact over the internet
|
|
|
|
without an intermediary that could reverse, freeze, or confiscate transactions.
|
|
|
|
This has been accomplished, though we are hitting scaling problems hard,
|
|
|
|
resulting in slow and expensive transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We now, however, need a mechanism of communication and pseudonymous identity
|
|
|
|
that can neither be censored, nor shilled and spammed into oblivion,
|
|
|
|
where private pseudonymous communications can carry money, and can be revealed
|
|
|
|
and proven by the parties to the transaction if they so choose subsequently,
|
|
|
|
enabling pseudonymous identities to accrue reputation as with Amazon and eBay.
|
|
|
|
And we want long accrued reputation to be also provable on the blockchain,
|
|
|
|
and not confiscatable or poisonable by third parties
|
|
|
|
like Amazon or eBay or the government.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At present the big weakness and privacy hole in crypto currency transactions is
|
|
|
|
that the metadata about the transaction must go other some other channel,
|
|
|
|
usually a channel that is insecure and far from private,
|
|
|
|
and the agreement to exchange money for goods and services cannot be easily
|
|
|
|
and provably linked to the payment. The linkage is made ad-hoc by some
|
|
|
|
mechanism outside the blockchain. We need an uncensorable net,
|
|
|
|
and we also need private communications that support secure transaction metadata
|
|
|
|
that is testified to by a hash in the blockchain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our project is to provide the tools and protocols for cryptographically secure
|
|
|
|
transactions and communications, such that identities are not rooted in a
|
|
|
|
certificate authority, and such that the parties have a timestamp on the blockchain
|
|
|
|
to the transaction metadata, a timestamp as to why the transaction and what it was
|
|
|
|
about. To replace eBay and Amazon, we build a reputation system on top of that,
|
|
|
|
and to replace limited liability name registration, bookkeeping, including book
|
|
|
|
keeping for funds shared to a common purpose.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suppose an identity solicits money from other identities for some common purpose.
|
|
|
|
He then has to prove that he is spending it on this purpose. Which at present
|
|
|
|
is done by the formation of a corporate identity subject to government oversight,
|
|
|
|
which tends to oversee that you are hiring people of the right accreditation, race,
|
|
|
|
sex, and sexual preference, rather than oversee that you are using the money for the
|
|
|
|
intended purpose. We need to provide, not just reputations of buyers and sellers,
|
|
|
|
but the means for trust in the collective use of funds. The corporate form is
|
|
|
|
collapsing under a pile of government interventions intended to secure results
|
|
|
|
that do not reflect the interests or desires of the corporation,
|
|
|
|
which undermine the cohesion and unity of the corporation. The CEO lives in fear
|
|
|
|
and terror of HR, legal, and accounting, because their powerbases are in the state,
|
|
|
|
not in the corporation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To make a start to resolve these problems, we implement the Zooko name
|
|
|
|
system for encrypted private and signed public communications,
|
|
|
|
and then a blockchain whose transactions contain within its timestamp
|
|
|
|
of the hash of the communications about the transaction.
|
|
|
|
We need a crypto currency that is inside of and on top of a secure system of
|
|
|
|
communication and identity.
|