configure: Remove the memset check and the HAVE_MEMSET macro
The compatibility workaround png_memset() has been removed long ago. The availability of memset() is a platform requirement.
This commit is contained in:
parent
f5d48df418
commit
6c059f8f5b
@ -18,9 +18,6 @@
|
|||||||
/* Define to 1 if you have the <memory.h> header file. */
|
/* Define to 1 if you have the <memory.h> header file. */
|
||||||
#undef HAVE_MEMORY_H
|
#undef HAVE_MEMORY_H
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* Define to 1 if you have the `memset' function. */
|
|
||||||
#undef HAVE_MEMSET
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* Define to 1 if you have the `pow' function. */
|
/* Define to 1 if you have the `pow' function. */
|
||||||
#undef HAVE_POW
|
#undef HAVE_POW
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
13
configure
vendored
13
configure
vendored
@ -13066,19 +13066,6 @@ fi
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
fi
|
fi
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for ac_func in memset
|
|
||||||
do :
|
|
||||||
ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "memset" "ac_cv_func_memset"
|
|
||||||
if test "x$ac_cv_func_memset" = xyes; then :
|
|
||||||
cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
|
|
||||||
#define HAVE_MEMSET 1
|
|
||||||
_ACEOF
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
else
|
|
||||||
as_fn_error $? "memset not found in libc" "$LINENO" 5
|
|
||||||
fi
|
|
||||||
done
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for ac_func in pow
|
for ac_func in pow
|
||||||
do :
|
do :
|
||||||
ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "pow" "ac_cv_func_pow"
|
ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "pow" "ac_cv_func_pow"
|
||||||
|
@ -144,7 +144,6 @@ AC_C_RESTRICT
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
# Checks for library functions.
|
# Checks for library functions.
|
||||||
AC_FUNC_STRTOD
|
AC_FUNC_STRTOD
|
||||||
AC_CHECK_FUNCS([memset], , AC_MSG_ERROR(memset not found in libc))
|
|
||||||
AC_CHECK_FUNCS([pow], , AC_CHECK_LIB(m, pow, , AC_MSG_ERROR(cannot find pow)) )
|
AC_CHECK_FUNCS([pow], , AC_CHECK_LIB(m, pow, , AC_MSG_ERROR(cannot find pow)) )
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Some later POSIX 1003.1 functions are required for test programs, failure here
|
# Some later POSIX 1003.1 functions are required for test programs, failure here
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user